Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Bisnis Syariah Lintas Batas: Studi Komparatif Hukum Acara BASYARNAS dan IICRA

Juliani Juliani

doi:10.59996/cendib.v3i3.1216

Authors

Juliani Juliani Universitas Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59996/cendib.v3i3.1216

Keywords:

Sharia Arbitration, BASYARNAS, IICRA, Cross-Border Contracts, Procedural Law

Abstract

The growth of the transnational Islamic economic industry demands legal certainty in resolving cross-border Sharia business disputes. Non-litigation channels through arbitration have become the main choice for global business players. This study aims to examine and deeply compare the effectiveness of procedural law, arbiter qualifications, as well as issues of jurisdiction and cross-border enforcement of decisions between the National Sharia Arbitration Body (BASYARNAS) in Indonesia and the International Islamic Centre for Reconciliation and Arbitration (IICRA) based in Dubai. The legal research method used is normative, specifically library research, through a comparative approach and a statute approach. Statute Approach: This is used to examine formal regulations, such as Law No. 30 of 1999, PERMA No. 14 of 2016, the 1958 New York Convention, as well as the internal procedural law codes of each arbitration institution. Research results show that BASYARNAS has massive jurisdictional limitations in cross-border disputes because it is court-dependent on domestic courts (Religious Courts) and does not have direct enforcement reach abroad. Meanwhile, IICRA is designed internationally to be court-independent because its procedural law relies directly on the 1958 New York Convention. This allows IICRA rulings to have a more universal transnational enforcement reach in countries that have ratified it, as long as it does not conflict with the public policy exception in the country where enforcement is carried out.

References

Aldohni, A. K. (2016). Resolving Islamic finance disputes through international commercial arbitration. Chicago Unbound International Immersion Program Papers, 1, 1–32. Diambil dari https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1 031&context=international_immersion_program_papersIICRA.

Anshori, A. G. (2010). Penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah: Analisis konsep dan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Basyarnas-MUI. (2020). Arbitration rules. Diambil dari Basyarnas-MUI. (2020). Pustaka peraturan perundang-undangan dan surat keputusan terkait kedudukan BASYARNAS-MUI. Diambil dari basyarnas-mui.org.

English outlines. Diambil dari https://iicra.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/CIAE-English-Outlines-2023.pdfJus

Fildza Nazhifah Kamila, dkk (2026) Peran BASYARNAS dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Luar Pengadilan di Indonesia: Media Hukum Indonesia, Vol. 4. No.2 https://ojs.daarulhuda.or.id/index.php/MHI/article/view/3593/3572 diakses tanggal 20 Maret 2026

Hak, N. (2017). Eksistensi Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Basyarnas) dalam penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 15(2), 245–260.

Harahap, M. Y. (2021). Arbitrase: Ditinjau dari Reglemen Acara Perdata (RV), International Convention, Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 1999. Sinar Grafika.

Headquarter. IICRA. (2023). Certified Islamic Arbitrator & Expert (CIAE)

Hertiawan, A., & Maulana, R. (2025). Problematika eksekusi putusan arbitrase transnasional dan perlindungan aset para pihak. Jurnal Hukum Komersial Kontemporer, 12(1), 45–60.

Hidayat. (2023). Mediasi-Arbitrase Syariah dan Regulasi Nasional, .Mahkamah Agung.

ht tps: / / jusmundi .com/en/document / rule/en- i icra- internat ional - islamic-centre-for-reconciliation-and-arbitration-arbitration-rules-iicra-arbitration-rules diakses tanggal 18 April 2026

Hukumonline. (2010, March 24). Problematika Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase Asing di Indonesia—Event & Training Hukumonline. hukumonline.com. https://www.hukumonline.com/events/baca/arsip/lt4b8f29efb35c5/talkhukumonline--discussion-lt4b8f29efb35c5/

IICRA. (2020). Sharia commercial arbitration rules (Article 19). Dubai: IICRA Headquarter.

Irawan, & Syafira. (2025). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah melalui BASYARNAS: Efektivitas dan Tantangannya. The Renewal of Islamic Economic Law, 6(1), 33–43

Khairandy, R. (2018). Problematika eksekusi putusan arbitrase asing di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 25(3), 441–462.

Mahkamah Agung. (2016). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Nomor 14 Tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Perkara Ekonomi Syariah. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.

Mundi. (2020). International Islamic Centre for Reconciliation and Arbitration:

Pustaka peraturan perundang-undangan dan surat keputusan terkait kedudukan BASYARNAS-MUI. Diambil dari basyarnas-mui.org.

Sutedi, A. (2014). Aspek hukum arbitrase dan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

United Nations. (2008). [Judul Dokumen Mengenai New York Convention 1958 dan Daya Jangkau Eksekusi Transnasional].

United Nations. (2008). Convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards (New York, 1958). New York: United Nations Publication.

Wirtz, A. (2016). Resolving Islamic Finance Disputes Through International Commercial Arbitration in the Gulf Region. International Program Papers, (24). https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/international_immersion_program_papers/32

Yasin, R. A., & Miladiyanto, S. (2026). Kajian Hukum Terhadap Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Dagang Internasional. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Multidisipliner, 3(01). https://ojs.ruangpublikasi.com/index.php/jpim/article/view/2125

Yunita, A. (2021). Efektifitas penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah melalui Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 9(1), 25–36.