Makna Hukuman Cambuk dalam QS. An-Nur Ayat 2 dan 4: Studi Komparatif Tafsir Sayyid Qutb dan Tafsir Al-Misbah

Asiska Nadia Hasibuan; Sori Monang

doi:10.59996/aksioreligia.v4i1.1064

Authors

Asiska Nadia Hasibuan Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Sori Monang Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59996/aksioreligia.v4i1.1064

Keywords:

Flogging, Surah An-Nur, Sayyid Qutb, M. Quraish Shihab, Comparative Interpretation

Abstract

The punishment of flogging in Surah An-Nur verses 2 and 4 is often understood merely as a physical sanction, even though these verses contain broader legal, moral, and social dimensions. This study aims to analyze and compare the interpretation of Sayyid Qutb in Fī Ẓilāl al-Qur’ān and M. Quraish Shihab in Tafsir Al-Misbah regarding the meaning of flogging in Surah An-Nur verses 2 and 4. This research uses a qualitative method based on library research with a comparative (muqāran) approach. The primary data are taken from Fī Ẓilāl al-Qur’ān and Tafsir Al-Misbah, while secondary data are obtained from books, journal articles, and relevant academic literature. The results show that both commentators agree that flogging is intended to protect public morality, individual honor, and social order. However, Sayyid Qutb emphasizes the enforcement of divine law and the sovereignty of God’s law (ḥākimiyyah), while M. Quraish Shihab emphasizes contextual understanding, the objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah), justice, and human dignity. This study concludes that flogging in the Qur’an should not be understood solely as physical punishment, but as a legal instrument aimed at preserving honor, morality, and public welfare.

References

Aisy, M. R., & Imawan, D. H. (2025). Hukuman hadd pelaku zina: Analisis tafsir klasik dan kontemporer Surat An-Nur ayat 1-3. Tahkim: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah, 21(1), 40–56.

Aisyah, H., & Najmudin, D. (2026). Hukuman cambuk di Aceh Nanggroe Darussalam: Tinjauan yuridis atas legitimasi hukum dan penyeimbangan prinsip hak asasi manusia. Jurnal Teologi Islam, 2(1), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.63822/m135ww78

Al-Qurtubi, M. ibn A. (2006). Al-Jāmi‘ li aḥkām al-Qur’ān (Vol. 12). Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Shatibi, I. ibn M. (1997). Al-Muwāfaqāt (Vol. 2). Dār al-Ma‘rifah.

Al-Zuhayli, W. (1989). Al-fiqh al-islāmī wa adillatuhu (Vol. 6–7). Dār al-Fikr.

Al-Zuhayli, W. (2009). Al-tafsīr al-munīr fī al-‘aqīdah wa al-syarī‘ah wa al-manhaj (Vol. 18). Dār al-Fikr.

Amalia DT, K. R., Fauziah, N. A., Musyahid, A., & Kuba, I. A. (2025). The Principle of Al-Ḥudūd Tasquṭ bisy-Syubuhāt: An Analysis of the Concept, Arguments, and Implications in Contemporary Islamic Criminal Law. al-Rasῑkh: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 14(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.38073/rasikh.3193

Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Azizha, N. T. & Naqiyah. (2025). Hudūd dalam Al-Qur’an: Pembacaan ulang hermeneutik atas hukuman seratus cambukan dalam QS. An-Nūr [24]: 2–3. Contemporary Quran, 5(2), 122–138.

Dayati, R., Pratiwi, Y., Zakir, Z. L., Wismanto, W., & Hibatullah, A. (2024). Penjelasan Kejahatan Hudud dan Saksi-saksinya dari Sudut Pandang Hukum Islam. MARAS: Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(1), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.60126/maras.v2i1.186

Fahrudin. (2021). Nalar Konstruktif Maqashid Syariah Dalam Studi Hukum Islam (Sebuah Studi Pengantar dalam Ilmu Maqashid Syariah). Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum, 6(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v6i1.3744

Fitriatunnisa, A., Rizkiana, A., & Yanti, I. (2025). Sumber, corak, dan metode penafsiran dalam kitab Tafsir Al-Muẓhiri: Analisis pada Surat An-Nur. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 6(1), 148–157.

Ibn Kathir, I. (1999). Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm (Vol. 6). Dār Ṭayyibah.

Ibn Rushd, M. ibn A. (2004). Bidāyat al-mujtahid (Vol. 2). Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Kayacan, M., & Şen, E. (2025). An Exegete in the Shadow of Criticism: Sayyid Qutb in the Context of Fī Ẓilāl Al-Qur’ān. Marife Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi, 25(2), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.33420/marife.1751793

Kementerian Agama RI. (2019). Al-Qur’an dan terjemahannya. Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an. Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI.

Kerwanto, Furqon, I., & Mubassyir, A. (2024). Diskursus seputar epistemologi Tafsīr Aḥkām. MIZANUNA: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 2(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.59166/mizanuna.v2i1.222

Lestari, W. (2024). Ta’zir Crimes in Islamic Criminal Law: Definition Legal Basis Types and Punishments. Al-Qanun: Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Hukum Islam, 5(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.58836/al-qanun.v5i1.21486

Maevskaya, L. B., & Aga, K. M. (2021). Development of Ibn Taymiyyah’s ideas in the works of Sayyid Qutb (1906-1966). Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1330

Maylisandi, L., Fadilah, A., & Syaputra, R. (2024). Pengaturan hukuman cambuk dalam hukum pidana Islam. Jurnal Sahabat ISNU-SU, 1(3), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.70826/jsisnu.v1i3.494

Mubarrok, M. R., Maharani, N. A., & Kholid, A. (2025). Hukum zina perspektif Abdul Qadir Shaibah Al-Hamd: Telaah tafsir QS. An-Nur ayat 2 dalam Kitab Tafsir Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Al-Madzhab, 2(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.15575/madzhab.v2i1.1011

Munandar, S. A., & Amin, S. (2023). Contemporary interpretation of religious moderation in the Qur’an: Thought analysis Quraish Shihab and its relevance in the Indonesian context. QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies, 2(3), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v2i3.1448

Nurhikmah. (2024). Maqashid Al-Shariah: Kerangka adaptif hukum Islam untuk menjawab tantangan kontemporer. Journal of Dual Legal Systems, 1(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.58824/jdls.v1i2.226

Qutb, S. (2003). Fī Ẓilāl al-Qur’ān (Vol. 4). Dar al-Shuruq.

Qutb, S. (2006). Ma‘ālim fī al-ṭarīq. Dar al-Shuruq.

Rahmawati, N., & Sa’i, M. (2025). Qadzaf Dalam Perspektif Fikih Jinayah: Pengertian, Unsur-Unsur Dan Hukuman Bagi Pelaku. TarunaLaw: Journal of Law and Syariah, 3(02), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v3i02.483

Rofiq, A., Pujiyono, P., & Arief, B. N. (2021). Eksistensi Tindak Pidana Ta’zir dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat Indonesia. Journal of Judicial Review, 23(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v23i2.4957

Rozy, Y. F., & Nirwana, A. (2025). Penafsiran “la taqrabu al-zina” dalam QS. Al-Isra’ ayat 32: Studi komparatif antara Tafsir Al-Azhar karya Buya Hamka dan Tafsir Al-Mishbah karya M. Quraish Shihab. QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies, 1(1), 65–77.

Rustandi, A. D., Truna, D. S., Anwar, R., & Muhyidin, A. (2022). Konteks Lokal dalam Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Toleransi dalam Kitab Tafsir Al-Mishbah Karya M. Quraish Shihab. AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis, 6(1), 319. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i1.3321

Saeed, A. (2006). Interpreting the Qur’an: Towards a contemporary approach. Routledge.

Saman, M. A., & Sahputra, H. (2025). Guiding the generation: Lessons from Al-Azhar and Al-Misbah on maisir and moral conduct. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Raushan Fikr, 14(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.24090/jimrf.v14i1.13647

Saputra, D. M., & Kurniawan, A. (2025). The Development of Theoretical Study of Social Interpretation: Social Relations. ALSYS: Jurnal Keislaman dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(4), 1318–1343. https://doi.org/10.58578/alsys.v5i4.6495

Shifa, S., Mahbob, T. M., & Danishmal, S. (2025). Nature of Crime in Criminal Law and Islamic Sharia. American Journal of Law and Political Science, 4(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.58425/ajlps.v4i1.341

Shihab, M. Q. (1992). Membumikan Al-Qur’an. Mizan.

Shihab, M. Q. (2002). Tafsir Al-Misbah: Pesan, kesan, dan keserasian Al-Qur’an (Vol. 2 & 6). Lentera Hati.

Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and woman. Oxford University Press.

Zuhra, N. M. (2020). Penerapan hukuman cambuk bagi pelaku pelecehan seksual dalam perkara jinayat dihubungkan dengan jaminan akan hak asasi manusia atas rasa aman dan perlindungan bagi korban. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v16i2.3668